Skip to main content

How Lessons Teach

A well-designed lesson combines several of the elements below, each doing different instructional work. Choose what the content and learner need—not what fills space.  

Micro-examples below are placeholders drawn from across our program areas. They will be replaced with annotated examples from actual Excelsior courses. 

Activating Prior Knowledge 

Opens by connecting new content to something students already know—from earlier in the course, from professional experience, or from common knowledge. Adult learners bring substantial real-world experience that course content can build on. Activating it reduces cognitive load and gives students a foothold before new material is introduced.

Instructor Explanation

The instructor’s own voice making sense of the material—not a summary of the readings, but genuine teaching. This is where the SME’s expertise shows up directly: the specific framing, the perspective shaped by experience, the detail a textbook glosses over. Instructor explanation is most valuable when it does something no existing resource does as well.

Real-World Application

Shows how a concept operates outside the textbook—in an actual workplace, field, or professional context. For adult learners, this element often determines whether content feels worth learning. It answers the question students are always asking, even when they do not say it: “When would I actually use this?”

Worked Example or Step-by-Step Walkthrough

Walks students through a process, calculation, or procedure one step at a time—showing the thinking, not just the result. Valuable for procedural, quantitative, or technical content where students need to see how to do something before they can do it themselves. A worked example differs from a real-world application: the application shows the concept in context; the walkthrough shows the steps. 

Analogy or Comparison

Uses something familiar to explain something unfamiliar, or compares two related concepts to sharpen understanding of both. Especially useful for abstract or technical concepts students have no prior frame of reference for. A good analogy creates a foothold students can build from—it does not flatten the concept, it opens it up.

Addressing Common Misconceptions

Explicitly names and corrects a misunderstanding students are likely to bring to the content—from prior coursework, professional experience, or general assumptions. This element is high-value because it anticipates confusion rather than waiting for it to surface in assessments. Adult learners, in particular, may arrive with informal prior knowledge that is partially wrong and surprisingly resistant to correction if it is not directly addressed.

Media

Video, audio, infographics, simulations, interactive activities—formats that convey information in ways text cannot. Choose media because it serves the learning, not because it makes the lesson feel more produced. A three-minute video showing a clinical procedure is irreplaceable. A five-minute talking-head video summarizing a reading is not. Before commissioning new media, check whether a credible existing resource already does the job.

Guiding Questions and Reflection Prompts

Questions that invite students to think rather than just read—to pause, apply, connect, or challenge. Guiding questions can frame a lesson at the start (“As you work through this lesson, consider…”), punctuate it in the middle, or close it with a prompt that bridges to the upcoming assessment. They do not need to be graded to be effective.

Annotated Examples

A real artifact—a document, a piece of student work, a case, a report, a data set, a piece of writing—with instructor commentary pointing out what is happening and why it matters. Annotated examples make implicit standards explicit and give students a concrete model to orient to. They are particularly effective when the artifact being annotated is imperfect: analyzing what is wrong with something often teaches more than presenting a polished ideal.

One specific use of this element is annotating AI-generated content. Rather than using AI output as lesson content, the SME uses it as an object of analysis—showing students exactly where the AI is superficial, inaccurate, or misleading, and why a more expert understanding differs. This builds subject-matter knowledge and critical AI literacy simultaneously.

Published on May 31, 2026, 2:49 PM EDT. Last updated on June 2, 2026, 12:48 PM EDT.